Listen to the audio version of this post here.
We were all preoccupied with the news last week, weren’t we? Some were glued to TV Wednesday afternoon, riveted by the images of mayhem at the United States Capitol. Others relied on Twitter for updates. And some got firsthand reports from friends at the front, texting or calling from Washington D.C.
Then there was the follow-up on Thursday and Friday. Analysis of security failures—how did something like this happen in the nation’s capital? Exploration of the perpetrators—who are these people anyway? And speculation about political fall-out for the president and his pals in Congress.
It was all-consuming, and for most of us upsetting. I’d guess I’m not the only one who got caught up in the coverage and didn’t get much work done.
I’m also not alone in wondering. When we’re all engrossed in a huge national news event, does business go on as usual? Or do we just let everything else slide for a day or two or three?
At branding agency CultureCraft, founder Nick Richtsmeier came out for quiet with an early warning on LinkedIn.
“Businesses and social media managers: It is a day in America like no other in recent memory. Turn off your auto social posts and pause your email campaigns. Nearly anything you do right now is going to be counterproductive and tone deaf.”
A lot of us must have felt the same way. It was noticeably quiet on LinkedIn. People were preoccupied by the violence in Washington. They seemed to be skipping the usual marketing messages, inspirational posts, and videos.
Big companies, though, jumped right in with comments about the furor in Washington.
Apple CEO Tim Cook: “Today marks a sad and shameful chapter in our nation’s history. Those responsible for this insurrection should be held to account, and we must complete the transition to President-elect Biden’s administration. It’s especially when they are challenged that our ideals matter most.”
CEO of Citi, Michael Corbat: “I am disgusted by the actions of those who have stormed the U.S. Capitol in an effort to disrupt the certification of the Electoral College, a process mandated by our Constitution as part of our practice of peaceful transitions of power between presidents.”
General Motors CEO Mary Barra Tweeted: “The peaceful transition of power is a cornerstone of American democracy, and regardless of politics the violence at the U.S. Capitol does not reflect who we are as a nation. It’s imperative that we come together as a country and reinforce the values and ideals that unite us.”
There were many more along the same lines; most of them sounded pretty much the same.
Which raises the question. Do we need to know what a consulting firm or mobile phone company thinks about the assault on the U.S. Capitol?
And what about smaller businesses like, say, yours. Or mine? Could the outrageous events unfolding in Washington D.C. be, as Nick Richtsmeir suggested, a cue to be quiet?
He posted the day after the insurrection: “Some of you are thinking you need to put out your company statement about yesterday’s events. I promise you, you do not.”
An alternate point of view from Ragan’s PR Daily, where they say silence is no longer the “safe” play. Instead, these communication experts say businesses should speak up about what’s going on.
They say it’s a mistake to proceed as if nothing’s happened or wait until the heat dies down and hope that the news cycle moves along quickly.
“Employees, customers and others expect companies to have a point of view on the difficult and traumatic issues facing the nation.”
I have to say, my clients probably do expect me to have a point of view (about almost anything!) but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re interested in hearing it. So, it never occurred to me that I needed to put out a statement about the events.
At the same time, it didn’t feel right to ignore the news and post some unrelated information because social media is part of my marketing mix.
So, I acknowledged our situation in my day-after LinkedIn post. And posed a question:
“Inc. says business owners worry about the economic consequences of what’s gone on in Washington. The big concern: “Running a company at a time of massive uncertainty, which is only exacerbated by the nation’s democratic principles coming under fire.”
Businesses in Washington and some state capitals are bringing in extra security for fear of violence and vandalism … Beyond that, how do you see the turbulence affecting businesses like ours?”
There were responses about distraction, emotional reaction to the Washington chaos, and concern about future disruptions.
It was the sort of exchange people who work together in an office might have over coffee. And it seemed to find a middle ground between pontificating about social issues and ignoring what was right in front of us.
So I’m curious about you. When it comes to putting in your two cents’ worth about the big issues and events that capture so much attention, how do you respond? Are you a business-as-usual person? Do you let the world know what you’re thinking? Or do you keep quiet until it blows over?
Post a comment about your response to things like the summer protests against police or the aggression at the U.S. Capitol.
Anyone who knows me knows I opine therefore I am, but I find myself moderating my thoughts now. I sense fanning the flames will not return us to an even keeled America. For now I allow law enforcement to enforce the law and give space to those who were sucked in over their heads to reach a firm footing so we can all move forward.
“Give space to those who were sucked in over their heads” — such an interesting way to put it, Kristina. I hope that space allows some people to reorient, although I’m not altogether optimistic that they want to.
I downloaded my stats, history, photo’s and video’s from my social media sites because I don’t want to lose the value of those diaries. Then I deleted those accounts. While doing this I learned that one of them was somehow set up for me by I don’t know who.. It took a little extra effort, but that one is now gone too. The problem today in my view is how our society is affected and manipulated. So I’ve chosen to no longer contend and let out of control AI algorithm’s decide what my bias or facts should be.
You’re not alone in giving social media a rest, Jeff. It’s becoming clearer and clearer how much influence they offer individuals who use that influence to our detriment. I haven’t abandoned social networking yet. I have opted to scroll on by posts that seem outrageous to me, without joining the fray.
Another insightful article from you Catherine….. thank you. Throughout my life I have always had my opinions about many things. As I’ve gotten older, I try to focus on what’s right rather than what’s wrong. My decision to deem something “right “, lies in my traditional upbringing and life philosophy. I have tempered expressing my Opinions greatly now as everything seems to be hotly contested in one way or another. I do find many of our current events disgusting and unthinkable But I am not compelled to broadcast my opinion on social media.
You know what they say about discretion and valor, Cindy. I’m not sure my Facebook friends, much less my clients and colleagues, need to hear my views about incendiary issues like the ones we’re confronting now.
Over the last few years, I do perceive a greater personal risk in expressing my political opinions in the wider world – not that I have anything of import to say. Still, with every national election, I do sincerely wish that the incoming government, (president and congress) be the greatest of our lifetime. Admittedly, that is a very low bar.
Fred, you are so right about the low bar!
Catherine, thank you for this interesting post. I’ve never thought politics belong in the workplace, and so we’ve been ‘business as usual’ here. We even had someone that works here that went to the 1/6 DC rally, not sure if they went to the Capitol. I’m curious but not going to ask.
As a servant leader I pay attention to my directs’ personal family lives (aware and empathic but not ‘involved’) and of course their career growth. But not their politics, religion, etc. So I’m not involved normally in how they personally respond to the outside world, and this is not the time to start.
The discussion on incitement and sedition is emergent due to the currently acute examples, but it has been chronically trending in this direction for a long time. I believe it is driven by the explosion and fragmentation of communication ‘channels.’ These targeted social media and cable/online news channels enable ever more profitable sale of our attention to advertisers (witness the market cap of Google and Facebook, or the evolution of ‘news’ channels where everything is Breaking News over a strident chyron). We get ‘entertainment’ for free, and we’ve trained them that the more riled up they make us the more product (attention) they have to sell. I guess we gradually started to like that or accept it in our personal lives. I hope a positive outcome of the recent events will be to serve as a wake up to rethink our participation in these sales cycles.
Interesting to think about your comments now, several months later, Thomas. I don’t see much evidence that we’ve rethought our participation in these sales cycles. If anything, people seem even more dug in, consuming the viewpoints that reinforce their own and tuning out the rest.
It doesn’t make me hopeful about our future.
I think the large companies are jumping on the bandwagon way too late. They should have taken a stand days after the election when it was clear Biden won. They stand for nothing.
The ones that leave me unimpressed are the companies saying they’re suspending all contributions to all politicians. Most of them are just laying low until the dust settles. It’s not exactly taking a principled stand.